Work-Life Balance? Post 1 of Many
avatar

(Friday Post Category:  Yes You Can! Women and Academia)

Since opening The Professor Is In, the question I’ve been most often asked, by women, is “how can I maintain some kind of work-life balance while pursuing a career in academia?” (The question I’ve been asked almost as often is, “when should I decide to throw in the towel and quit trying to have an academic career?” That question I will confront next week).

This question is difficult. The fact is, maintaining a work-life balance has become almost impossible in any job in the downsizing U.S. economy. We are expected to do more and more with less and less. Hours are increasing while pay is falling in most professional sectors (law, medicine, etc.) Even the “booming” sectors of the economy, like IT and Finance, are based on truly inhumane expectations for hours of work. The eight hour day and the weekends for home life are becoming things of the past.

In that context is the academy. Academic pay scales are declining while work expectations are increasing. Expectations for tenure go up, class sizes go up, administrative duties go up, and support goes down.

Women in the academy are trying to juggle, on the job, writing, research, teaching, service, and if tenure track, the clicking tenure clock, and, at home, partners, children, home life, spirit-sustaining personal interests, and the biological clock. Even thinking about timing a pregnancy, for a graduate student or assistant professor, can be overwhelming.

Senior female colleagues are not always that helpful either as models or mentors. Once, as a new assistant professor, at a dinner at a national conference, I turned to the woman sitting next to me, a highly productive, prolific department head about 40 years old, and earnestly, oh so earnestly asked, “HOW did you manage to have two kids??” Barely glancing my way she replied, with a sneer in her voice, “well, I had sex with my husband….” before turning away to talk to someone more important.

The senior women with children in my departments mostly fell into two camps: those who paused after tenure to dedicate themselves to child-rearing and remained affably at the Associate level, and those who handed their children over to full-time nannies and worked ridiculous hours, and made it to Full.

I was never happy with either of those choices.  In the end, chaotic life circumstances placed me into the former category, although I was never affable.

In my first year on the tenure track I applied for and won two major research and writing fellowships, including the National Endowment for the Humanities Fellowship for University Professors. My department generously allowed me to stagger them, and I ended up with two full years off. I spent those two years writing my book and commencing a second project. And having my first child. When I returned to work full time, my tenure case was secure, so I felt comfortable having a second child.

After the insanity of the first year, and its all new class preps and the unfamiliar rounds of committee meetings and department obligations, and demands of undergraduate and graduate students, my life came to feel sort of balanced. When I went back to work after my 2 years of leave, my children were in daycare, but I religiously picked them up before 5 PM, and dedicated my time at home, when they were awake, to hanging out with them. I did not work a lot on weekends, and limited my conferences to two large national meetings a year. I woke early and wrote while they slept.  I worked out every day.  And I had a spouse who did his part—got the kids up and fed and dressed for the day, cooked dinner, and did a lot around the house.

Basically, my experience of the tenure track echoed my experience of graduate school: balance of personal and academic life is possible when you are well and abundantly funded, freed from excessive teaching or service responsibilities, and have support at home.  It’s why “The Professor” is so fixated on grant-writing, FYI.

I know that for many, these resources are unavailable. TAs, adjuncts, the un- and underderemployed, assistant professors on the tenure track in penny-pinching, chaotic departments—so many in our world are scrambling desperately to keep their heads above water.

What struck me at my R1 institution, however, was the degree to which even those who did enjoy access to these resources refused to use them to ease their lives. Indeed, they just seemed to work harder.

My tenured colleagues never let up. They were always in their office. They were always working. They never had time for lunch or dinner or coffee. They were always at this conference or that symposium, or if not actually there, then writing the paper in preparation. They weren’t just grading, or in meetings, or in class. They were launching a new university-wide initiative, or spearheading a new major, or starting a film festival, or creating a regional consortium.

None of these things is bad. In fact a lot of them are good. But what I could never entirely understand, was: why? The hours the faculty put in to accomplish all of this were impossible. They didn’t make sense. They seemed counter-productive.

I came to feel that university faculty are more thoroughly interpellated into the logic of capital than anyone else in the economy. Because after tenure they’re basically given a choice about how much they’ll work, and they STILL work themselves practically to death.

Why couldn’t senior faculty just take a break? Why couldn’t they slow down? Why couldn’t they sit still for a moment, and take a breath?

It’s my view that they don’t want to. Tenured professors have a choice, and too many choose to have lives out of balance. Why, I’m not sure. But I increasingly suspect it’s because if they slow down, if they sit still, then they might have to notice.

  • Notice the disintegration of their workplace.
  • Notice the whittling away of their power in the institution.
  • Notice the marginalization of their voice in society.
  • Notice the scared graduate students and the struggling adjuncts and the anxious assistant professors.
  • Notice that their privilege rests on countless others’ exploitation.

Professors are smart. So they keep moving. To keep that knowledge at bay as long as they can.

 

 

 

 

 

Karen

About Karen

I am a former tenured professor at two institutions--University of Oregon and University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign. I have trained numerous Ph.D. students, now gainfully employed in academia, and handled a number of successful tenure cases as Department Head. I've created this business, The Professor Is In, to guide graduate students and junior faculty through grad school, the job search, and tenure. I am the advisor they should already have, but probably don't.
This entry was posted in Alt-University Critique, Race/Gender/Sexuality, Strategizing Your Success in Academia, Tenure--How To Get It, Work/Life Balance in Academia, Yes, You Can: Women in Academia and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Work-Life Balance? Post 1 of Many

  1. Z says:

    Well I have come to favor the have kids in graduate school model. That way you have them when your schedule is the most flexible and you are most likely to be at a university with a child care centre. Then, when you are an assistant professor, they are already in school. Also, on job interviews, people won’t worry that you might get pregnant – you already did that (sorry to sound so sanguine but it’s the truth).

    I am of course no one to speak, since I quit overworking before tenure not afterwards. But it is true, I think – tenured faculty, especially with good circumstances, can’t afford emotionally to stop overworking because if they did, they’d see what was happening.

  2. Z says:

    Or, another take: no, there is no work-life balance, and you have to give up on that. BUT at the same time, you have to take time off. In some weeks that can mean only working 30-40 hours. In some summer weeks it can mean being on vacation. But, in order to have enough time for the interesting part of the job, you have to keep up those 50-70 hour weeks some of the time, and more than that some of the time. I think not hoping for a balanced life is actually more restful … I just also think the more important thing is not to allow it to get chaotic, not to lose control of it … and I think that if there’s no way to get control of it, then yes it is time to throw in the towel.

    Of course, if I personally throw in the towel it will be to do something even less balanced (JD), so once again I am no one to speak.

  3. You comments about senior professors’ refusal even to consider seeking a work/life balance are so true. I work at a place I call Office Park University: as you can tell by the name, it is very much a group of self-important people with a middle-management mentality, lacking in joy or any sense of play. The atmosphere is very similar to the one you describe at UI (in your guest post at WorstProfessor).
    My solution has been to aggressively seek greater balance since getting tenure. I joined a circus, later co-founded another, appeared in nightclubs and at events for years as a performance artist/ buffoon, and created a vibrant circle of friends off campus. As a result, OPU increasingly seems like a job, not an identity: though I continue to write and publish, I feel little investment in my institution.
    I know your site is dedicated chiefly to graduate students and early professors, but I think many more senior folk could benefit from hearing the message that a life bounded only by academia is a narrow purview indeed.

    • Karen Karen says:

      I want to be your friend!

    • Isako says:

      Squadratomagico, thanks for inspiring us by posting here! During my sabbatical leave I started learning improv and hope to be in a performing group soon. It’s the most fun I’ve ever had, and I also think my improv skills will make me a more effective teacher. But the second part is incidental; having a fun life is the most important work any person can do. :-)

  4. Thanks, Isako! Good luck with your performing career — I think it’s a great complement to academia!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>