• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

The Professor Is In

Guidance for all things PhD: Graduate School, Job Market and Careers

  • Home
  • Courses & Events
    • How To …
    • The Art of the Academic Cover Letter
    • The Art of the Article
    • Unstuck: The Art of Productivity
    • On Demand Courses
    • Upcoming Live Webinars
    • Free Productivity Webinars
    • Gift Certificates
  • Personalized Job Help
    • Document Editing
    • Quick Reviews
    • Specials
    • Interview Prep
    • Personal Negotiating Assistance
    • One on One Career Consults
    • Testimonials
    • Interview Testimonials
    • Graduate School Application Assistance
  • Productivity
  • Coaching
    • Productivity Coaching
    • Private Coaching
    • Leaving Academia Coaching Group
  • The Professor Is Out
    • It’s OK to Quit
    • Our Art of Leaving Program
    • Prof Is OUT Services
    • Our Prof Is OUT Team
    • Prof is OUT Client Testimonials
    • Ex-Academics: A TPIO Support Community
  • Workshops
  • Blog

Self-Criticism and the Academy — Postac Post by Jessica Langer

By Karen Kelsky | March 29, 2016

by Post-ac Career Coach Jessica Langer

Jessica Langer
Jessica Langer

Academia is a climate of constant and unrelenting criticism.

This is obvious in a professional sense: our work is often called “criticism” as a catch-all, and in the process of building upon our field colleagues’ existing work it is often necessary to counter it. Some of this work is necessary: reading “against the grain” of dominant cultural or critical texts, for example, and identifying problematic elements in texts.

After a while, criticism may become the academic’s dominant mode of thinking. This can be great in a professional sense: you become attuned to minutiae and intricacies in arguments that you wouldn’t otherwise have identified, and you gain a more nuanced perspective in your work.

And if it ended there, it would be perfect. But most of the time – particularly, though certainly not exclusively, for women, people of colour and other people who are variously and/or intersectionally marginalized – it isn’t. Because when you are trained to look at everything with a critical eye, it’s almost inevitable that such a critical eye will turn inward.

There is no “you are good enough as you are” in academia. There is no “you are enough”, in fact. There is, instead, a constant drumbeat of necessity for accomplishment after accomplishment, paired with the constant risk of failure. And this doesn’t end when you pass your comps or go ABD or get your PhD or get a tenure-track job or even when you get tenure (especially since tenure itself is changing and, potentially, ending). There is an endless lineup of paper submissions and conference presentations and manuscript reviews and student evaluations, all of which represent instances in which you are being explicitly judged. Judgment after judgment, often carried out anonymously (and viciously).

In academia, you are your work – as I’ve discussed before, the academic system deliberately cuts its acolytes off from their outside support networks and from outside sources of income, so as to develop total devotion to the system on pain of failure that is not only professional but personal. And if you are your work, and your work is constantly criticised as part of its purpose, then academics live in a state of constant surveillance and criticism – and junior academia live in a state of constant self-surveillance and self-criticism, as they add ‘try not to piss off anyone senior or important’ to the list.

One of the most significant things I’ve noticed in my post-academic work with clients transitioning out of academia is the extent to which they have gotten into the habit of extraordinarily harsh and total self-criticism, to the extent that they are sometimes unable to recognize their own accomplishments as accomplishments. One of my clients teaches at an Ivy League university that everyone reading this has heard of; she actually didn’t mention it initially, and when I told her – incredulously and with no small amount of awe – that literally any employer would be impressed by the fact that she taught at this school, she demurred and said, “Oh, but I’m just an adjunct there!” (Protip for the reader: no one outside of academia cares if you were an adjunct. If you teach at Major Ivy, they will be impressed as hell.) My clients will have incredible things on their resumes, things that would impress almost any non-academic employer – years-long stints abroad doing fascinating work, major grants, speaking gigs at European embassies – and will demur because they simply cannot see these things as the impressive, high-status things they are.

What’s more, these people with these incredible experiences and accomplishments will often see themselves as failures because they don’t have a TT job in academia. For no other reason than because they aren’t on the tenure track. It’s astonishing. But I think I know why.

My theory: because academia trains you to be abusive to yourself. To constantly criticize your own work as well as others’, and never to be satisfied or even content with your work. To put yourself in situations in which you are infantilized and made powerless within a strict hierarchical system in which you are a waste product, not an intended outcome. To accept negativity from yourself that you would never allow to be directed towards someone you love.

This constant self-criticism and inability to see or accept success is very common among my clients and among people leaving academia in general, and it breaks my heart.

So here is my message to you:

Your accomplishments are worthwhile, and they mean something, and they are important. You are not a failure. The academy does not get to determine whether you are OK. You are OK no matter what.

And if you can’t accept that, then here’s a shorter message, especially if you’re leaving academia:

You are no longer obligated always to second-guess and think twice and surveil yourself. You are allowed to be who you are.

You are free.

Similar Posts:

  • On Selling Out: A Semi-Manifesto – Langer #postac post
  • The Art of Facing Criticism
  • “So You Want to Get a Ph.D. in the Humanities” (Take II)
  • You Belong
  • Academia Wasn’t Meant For Me – #Postac Guest Post

Filed Under: Alt-University Critique, Intersectional Analyses, Mental Health and Academia, Post-Ac Job Search, Quitting--An Excellent Option, Shame

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Renee says

    March 29, 2016 at 1:16 pm

    This post made me cry. I am not an educator, but I am a student, a senior in a well-respected philosophy program. I have seen, in my years as student, this relentless self-abuse in my professors, and if I try to offer legitimate praise to my mentors, I am not only shrugged off as “obviously not looking critically enough and therefore stupid,” I am dismissed because I am female and most of my educators are male.

    “Your work is important to me for [such-and-such well thought-out reason] is NOT the same thing as “I want to sleep with you.” As a student, I am consigned to a role of silence or emerging self-critic, and I hate this about academia.

    Reply
    • Karen says

      March 29, 2016 at 8:25 pm

      Hear, hear. I’m sorry that you’re confronting this, though. Philosophy is a very very tough field for women.

      Reply
  2. Self Critical Academic says

    March 29, 2016 at 4:35 pm

    Thank you, I needed to hear this message today.

    Reply
  3. Sumaya Aman says

    March 29, 2016 at 6:34 pm

    “You are free.”

    I’ve always wondered what it is that I’m holding onto when it comes to academia. For years I’ve felt that it has taken more away from me than I’ve gained from it. Education is such a wonderful and important thing, so it might be the institution of it that leaves me so mentally out of breath. I wish I still loved it.

    Reply
  4. ANTHONY BURKE says

    March 29, 2016 at 8:47 pm

    Thankyou!

    Reply
  5. Janet Janzen says

    March 30, 2016 at 7:41 am

    I recommend looking at the ideas of Rene Girard. He links the drive for originality with the impulse in academia to compete with one another. I think this is tied to the need to criticize instead of looking for the strengths of an argument and trying to emulate these strengths. Inverted our need to criticize may help paradoxically increase creativity within academic communities.

    Reply
  6. Nicole Roccas says

    March 30, 2016 at 9:35 am

    This essay put into words so many things I’ve been trying to articulate for myself since defending last October. One facet of the problem is that I don’t think it’s just academia that makes us (self-)critical–it also attracts people who tend towards unhealthy forms self-criticism. I had to learn that about myself–that part of what brought me to academia was the thrill of meeting others who were more critical of me than I was. Somehow, it felt safe. Now that I’m on the “outside,” I see this all of these tendencies through new eyes and feel, as you say, increasingly free–more so than I ever did in graduate school. Thank you for writing this!

    Reply
    • Akina says

      June 11, 2016 at 12:54 pm

      “that part of what brought me to academia was the thrill of meeting others who were more critical of me than I was”

      This made me both laugh and cry because of how true it is for me. Thank you for sharing that.

      Reply
  7. Kaz says

    March 30, 2016 at 5:37 pm

    If you’re in some bullshit program like … oh anything in the humanities pretty much, then your self-criticism is just honesty. You’ve built your career on spewing reams of verbiage that you know well signifies nothing and has no meaning. Those moments of self-doubt are periods of lucidity when you see yourself through the perspective of someone who does something real for a living; the proverbial “eyes of the world”, so to speak.

    Renee writes about a “well-respected philosophy program”, good grief. What is it that you DO in this program? What is the product?

    You mull over angels-on-the-head-of-a-pin type discussions in which there is not only no right answer, but no idea what it might look like and no compass and chart for knowing whether you’re even approximately navigating toward one.

    Yet somehow you believe that some of you are ranked above some others. Based on what?

    Reply
    • Cygnifier says

      April 8, 2016 at 8:10 pm

      Kaz — Perhaps the next article in the queue is for you: “Don’t Be That Asshole”!

      Reply
  8. Ronnie says

    March 30, 2016 at 5:44 pm

    Did anyone else notice the end of this article and the beginning of the next? 😀

    “You are no longer obligated always to second-guess and think twice and surveil yourself. You are allowed to be who you are. You are free.”

    “Don’t Be That Asshole”

    Reply
  9. George Entenman says

    March 31, 2016 at 9:34 am

    I loved my years as a graduate student in Linguistics at UT Austin. I got to think long and deeply about my dissertation, pursue clues, dissect arguments and have discussions with Bob Harms, my wonderful chair professor.

    But I didn’t want to finish and have to move away and teach. There were few jobs in my field. I suspected that the foundations of theoretical linguistics were shaky (and in the century of neuroscience I feel this even more strongly). Mostly I didn’t feel confident enough to be an academic: I couldn’t imagine myself standing up and teaching or proposing theories that I wasn’t absolutely certain about.

    I’ve always perceived academia as being extremely competitive, a word not in the article because you’re looking at the flip side, the effects of criticism, something which I perceive as often delivered not in a spirit of inquiry but aggressively. We all know the academics who stand up after a talk and pugnaciously attack the speaker.

    One time I gave my chair professor a dissertation chapter saying that another linguist’s data seemed to contradict my shiny new theory. I said that it “seemed unlikely”, “maybe mistaken” or something like that. My professor told to me to state emphatically that my theory was correct and that the other linguist’s data were wrong. “It’s his job to prove you wrong, not yours!” I loved this advice because it did give me confidence. (By the way, I got my Ph.D. and still believe in my theory.)

    Then, when I’d decided not to pursue academia and to take a job as a publisher’s rep (traveling salesman to independent bookstores) for a major NY Publisher, someone gave me this priceless advice:

    “Academics have the least imagination of anyone. They think that the only thing you can do with a Ph.D. is teach.”

    I was free!

    Reply
  10. Caroline says

    April 2, 2016 at 3:22 pm

    This is a really important post. Thank you! I really enjoyed an article by Lisa Ruddick (years ago) that connects with this in fascinating ways. A useful link I think: https://english.uchicago.edu/sites/english.uchicago.edu/files/Ruddick,%20Near%20Enemy.pdf

    Reply
  11. Jessica says

    April 10, 2016 at 4:33 pm

    I’d really like to know if you think that academia is qualitatively different from any other area of endeavor when it comes to performance evaluation. More specifically, can you name a field in which “you are good enough as you are” pertains?

    Reply
  12. Joe says

    April 12, 2016 at 9:03 am

    This taught self-abuse reminds me of Neil Gaiman’s short story “Other People” (it starts just after 1:41): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x-K5p3VrrjQ

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Bookmarks for March 30th from 22:08 to 22:40 : Extenuating Circumstances says:
    March 31, 2016 at 5:03 am

    […] [toread] Self-Criticism and the Academy — Postac Post by Jessica Langer – by Post-ac Career Coach Jessica Langer Jessica Langer Academia is a climate of constant and unrelenting criticism. This is obvious in a professional sense: our work is often called […]

    Reply
  2. D is Divergent – Empire for a Blueberry says:
    March 31, 2016 at 8:38 am

    […] In 2008, my husband and I began a miserable trek through the job market. I hated that process with a passion. Jessica Langer did a wonderful job explaining what academia can do to a person in the article I link to here. […]

    Reply
  3. D is for Divergent – Empire for a Blueberry says:
    March 31, 2016 at 8:40 am

    […] In 2008, my husband and I began a miserable trek through the job market. I hated that process with a passion. Jessica Langer did a wonderful job explaining what academia can do to a person in the article I link to here. […]

    Reply
  4. The Rearview Mirror and the Road Ahead, One Year After My Dissertation | Un/Settled says:
    April 4, 2016 at 9:11 am

    […] had also grown weary of the culture of the Ivory Tower, or what Jessica Langer has recently summed up as the  “climate of constant and unrelenting criticism” – that […]

    Reply
  5. How to Hope in Graduate School – STEM Diversity Network says:
    July 1, 2016 at 6:38 pm

    […] would never diminish clinical struggles or mental abuse. Jessica Langer vivisects here the clogging atmosphere of academe with its brutal conditions of “constant self-surveillance […]

    Reply
  6. The Golden Rule in Research | .oOo. says:
    September 12, 2016 at 2:32 pm

    […] is a completely different world from Corporate, but it’s not- take a post like this and just delete the 1 word. There are enough  parallels with “outsider” society in it […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Buy My Book!

4.8 stars on Amazon!

The_Professor_Is_In.indd

Get Immediate Help

In addition to our blog and book, we have upcoming live webinars, pre-recorded webinars and other programs that you can get started on right away:

The Art of the Academic Cover Letter
The Art of the Article
Unstuck: The Art of Productivity
Quick Reviews
Free Productivity Webinars

Categories

  • #MeTooPhD
  • Academic Job Search
    • How To Choose and Manage Recommenders
    • How to Interview
    • How To Write Academic Job Cover Letters
    • How To Write CVs
    • Landing Your Tenure Track Job
    • Major Job Market Mistakes
    • Negotiating Offers
  • Adjunct Issues
  • Advising Advice
  • Alt-University Critique
  • Black Lives Matter
  • COVID19
  • Dispatches
  • Goodbye Ivory Towers
  • Graduate Student Concerns
    • Bad Advisors and Good Mentors
  • How To Do Conferences
  • How to Get Grants and Fellowships
  • International Perspectives
  • Intersectional Analyses
  • Makeup
  • Marginalized Voices
  • Mental Health and Academia
  • Ph.D. Poverty
  • Podcast
  • Post-Ac Free-Lancing and Small Business
  • Post-Ac Job Search
    • Careers Outside
  • Postdoc Issues
  • Productivity
    • Book Proposals and Contracts
    • Publishing Issues
    • Writing
  • Promote Yourself!
  • Quitting–An Excellent Option
  • Racism in the Academy
  • Rearview Mirror
  • Resumes & Postac Docs
  • Sexual Harassment in the Academy
  • Shame
  • Stop.Acting.Like.A.Grad.Student
  • Strategizing Your Success in Academia
  • Teaching and Research Statements
  • Teaching Demos
  • Teaching Portfolios
  • Tenure–How To Get It
    • How To Build Your Tenure File
    • Surviving Assistant Professorhood
  • The Campus Visit
  • Unstuck
  • Webinars
  • What Not To Wear
  • Women of Color in Academia
  • Work/Life Balance in Academia
  • Yes, You Can: Women in Academia
  • Your Second and Third Jobs

Footer

About Us

  • Who Is Dr. Karen?
  • Who Is On the TPII Team?
  • In The News
  • Contact Me
  • FAQs
    • Why Trust Me?
  • Testimonials

Community

  • #MeTooPhD
  • Peer Editing
  • PhD Debt Survey
  • Support Fund
  • I Help With Custody Cases for Academics

Copyright © 2023 The Professor Is In·

We Are Redefining Academic Community

That’s why we upgraded our private
Mighty Network.

We are committed to building a community with a focus on productivity support. Every day, in a dedicated space, we offer free coaching advice and encouragement. And the couple thousand people who have already joined are steadily building a supportive and interactive community devoted to that elusive idea of work-life balance.

Learn More

Get on Dr. Karen's Schedule

Get on my schedule to work on your tenure track job cover letter, CV, grant applications, book proposals, interview preparation, and more.  [si-contact-form form=’2′]