• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

The Professor Is In

Guidance for all things PhD: Graduate School, Job Market and Careers

  • Home
  • Courses & Events
    • How To …
    • The Art of the Academic Cover Letter
    • The Art of the Article
    • Unstuck: The Art of Productivity
    • On Demand Courses
    • Upcoming Live Webinars
    • Free Productivity Webinars
    • Gift Certificates
  • Personalized Job Help
    • Document Editing
    • Quick Reviews
    • Specials
    • Interview Prep
    • Personal Negotiating Assistance
    • One on One Career Consults
    • Testimonials
    • Interview Testimonials
    • Graduate School Application Assistance
  • Productivity
  • Coaching
    • Productivity Coaching
    • Private Coaching
    • Leaving Academia Coaching Group
  • The Professor Is Out
    • It’s OK to Quit
    • Our Art of Leaving Program
    • Prof Is OUT Services
    • Our Prof Is OUT Team
    • Prof is OUT Client Testimonials
    • Ex-Academics: A TPIO Support Community
  • Workshops
  • Blog

The Dreaded Teaching Statement: Eight Pitfalls

By Karen Kelsky | September 12, 2016

We’ve looked at the Cover Letter and the CV; today we look at the Teaching Statement.

An expanded and updated version of this post can now be found in Chapter  25 of my book, The Professor Is In: The Essential Guide to Turning Your Ph.D. Into a Job.

Here at The Professor Is In we have reached the point in the Fall job market season in which many of our clients have finished work on their job letters and their c.v.s—and damn, do they look good!–and have moved on to their teaching statements.

And once again, I am struck by how many really brilliant and talented young scholars, including those who are otherwise terrific writers, fall flat on their faces in their teaching statements. It’s just painful. The teaching statement first drafts are, by and large, simply excruciating to read.

Apparently these things are just brutal to write.

But why?

I think there are several reasons, actually. A partial, speculative list would include these:

  • The audience and its expectations are unclear
  • The genre is rarely explained
  • The genre allows for great variation, with few obvious parameters for length and tone
  • The expected content at first blush seems overly “obvious” and rote (ie, “I am passionate about teaching”)
  • Feelings about teaching are often intense and hard to articulate in academic prose.

The mistakes that teaching statement writers make seem to fall into fairly consistent patterns that derive from the confusions and mystifications listed above. In this post I am going to identify the major pitfalls of the worst teaching statements, and offer suggestions to guide you as you craft your own.

Did you know we edit Teaching Statements and Portfolios? Drop us a line.

Error #1: It is too long

There are fewer hard and fast rules of teaching statements than there are for things like c.v.s and cover letters. So, there may be scholars and departments and search committees that have no problem with lengthy ones. But it is the official position of Dr. Karen that a teaching statement should be no longer than one page.

The reason is that a teaching statement is always a subsidiary document to a larger job application, which already includes a job letter, a c.v., references, and possibly a writing sample. It is simply not realistic or reasonable to expect the search committee to wade through a 3 page single-spaced teaching statement on top of all of that. While some dedicated individuals might, the vast majority will not. So, be your own best advocate, and make your statement as easy as possible to digest.

Believe me, everything you actually NEED to say in a teaching statement can be easily said in one page.

And while we’re on the subject, I don’t mean one page in 11pt font with 1/2” margins either. I mean one page with nice one inch wide margins on all sides, and a nice legible 12 pt font that is easy on middle-aged eyes.

It is one of the principles I try to inculcate in my TPII work, that white space on a page communicates expansiveness and confidence. Line upon line of miniscule font, crammed up to the edges of the paper, by contrast, communicates insecurity and desperation.

You know how when you get ready for a long backpacking trip, and they tell you to pack your backpack with everything you think you need, walk around the block with it, come back, and take half out? Well, when you write a professional job document, write everything you think need to say, then go back and take half out. Always write less.

Error #2: You tell a story instead of making statements supported by evidence.

This is probably the single most common pitfall of the teaching statement. For some reason candidates think that the genre requires the “story of my teaching life.” Ie, “I always like to use multi-media materials in the classroom. I first discovered the value of these when I taught ‘Introduction to Cultural Anthropology’ at the Eastern Tennessee State last spring.  In that class I had the opportunity to use a wide range of videos and online materials. Students told me that they really loved these, and I came to feel that these are excellent methods for promoting in-class discussions. I plan to use them in future classes as well.”

I’ll bet some of you reading this post think that the above is totally great. It isn’t. It’s rambly and utterly enmeshed in the single greatest principle of bad writing, which is that it Tells, when it needs to Show.

We don’t want the Story of Teaching. We want principles of teaching, and evidence that you exemplify these principles in specific classroom goals and practices.

Remember that this piece of writing is sometimes called a Teaching Philosophy. Now I dislike that term, because I think ti encourages writers to be even more wooey and tell-y than otherwise, but it does point to one major goal: the statement has to articulate a wide general good that can be achieved through university pedagogy at its broadest level. Then the writer demonstrates, in concrete and specific terms, how this good is manifested in specific teaching strategies, with examples. Then evidence is provided to show it was done effectively. Then there is a conclusion. And the essay is finished.

Worried about your Teaching Philosophy? Drop us a line.

To repeat: wide general good—>teaching strategies that manifest this good –>examples from specific classes —evidence that the strategies were effective –>conclusion

The most important point here is that you provide evidence that SHOWS (rather than tells) how you teach. This does not mean teaching evals or numerical outcomes per se, but rather that you describe a course, a specific teaching strategy that you used and why, what the outcomes were, and feedback from students that was illuminating.

Error #3: You express sentiments that are saccharine, obvious and indistinguishable from countless other applicants.

Error #4: You mis-read your audience

Error #5: You are excessively humble, especially if you are female

Error #6: You are excessively emotional, especially if you are female.

Language such as

“I am delighted when students tell me…”

“I would be thrilled to teach your course in xxx…”

“I am so excited to use new materials…”

“It would be a great pleasure to create new courses…”

“I can’t say enough about how much I enjoy…”

may seem friendly and engaged, but it is actually  overly-emotional and highly feminized in ways that, again, are self-sabotaging on the tenure track job market.

Women in particular must beware of their tendency to over-invest in a “nice” persona in their teaching statements. Teaching at the tenure track level is not about being nice. It is about being a professional.

Realize that the “nicer” and “sweeter” you sound, the more you are characterizing yourself as the classic female perennial one-year replacement adjunct.

Those who are competitive in the tenure track market, by contrast, articulate a teaching persona that is completely consistent with their researcher persona: serious, intellectually hard-hitting, disciplinarily cutting edge, demanding, and with high standards and expectations.

Error #7: You fail to link your research and teaching into a single consistent whole.

Error #8:  You don’t have a Conclusion

For the complete updated version of my Teaching Statement advice, see my book, The Professor Is In: The Essential Guide to Turning Your Ph.D. Into a Job.

 

Let us help you with your Teaching Statement and/or Portfolio. Drop us a line to learn how.

 



Similar Posts:

  • Dr. Karen’s Rules of the Research Statement
  • The Weepy Teaching Statement: Just Say No
  • What is Evidence of Teaching Excellence?
  • Dr. Karen’s (Partial) Rules for the Artist’s Statement
  • The Golden Rule of the Research Statement

Filed Under: Major Job Market Mistakes, Strategizing Your Success in Academia, Teaching and Research Statements, Teaching Portfolios

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Melissa says

    September 16, 2011 at 7:13 am

    *giggle* Hey! I resemble those remarks!
    Thanks, Karen.
    It’s a challenge to change my focus from my subject matter, and how passionate I am about it, to the results I get in the classroom. It’s a great point.

    Reply
  2. Digger says

    September 16, 2011 at 7:32 am

    “You must give at least one example that your readers will likely be able to say of, later, “oh yeah…she’s that one who assigns the mini-ethnographies of the meat-packers, right?””

    I love that this advice makes being “that girl” a positive thing.

    Reply
    • Karen says

      September 16, 2011 at 10:03 am

      Always be memorable!

      Reply
  3. ABD still says

    September 16, 2011 at 9:20 am

    Fabulous post. Just fabulous. My statement suffers from most problems you mention, especially overt passion, female humbleness and story-telling. Many thanks, Karen!

    Reply
    • Karen says

      September 16, 2011 at 10:01 am

      LOL. Always happy to be of service.

      Reply
  4. Jenn says

    October 19, 2011 at 1:13 pm

    Great advice. Question about keeping the teaching statements ‘short’ … when they say they want ‘evidence of teaching effectiveness’ do they want teaching evaluations? summaries of teaching evaluations? pages and pages of teaching evaluations?

    Reply
    • V87 says

      October 2, 2013 at 9:59 pm

      This is excellent question that almost never receives a clear answer 🙁

      Is there one?

      Reply
      • Karen says

        October 3, 2013 at 7:35 am

        read my post, “What is Evidence of Teaching Effectiveness?”

        Reply
  5. MG says

    April 22, 2012 at 5:05 pm

    What should you focus on if you don’t have a lot of teaching experience and thus cannot be very concrete? Any suggestions?

    Reply
    • Karen says

      April 23, 2012 at 10:08 am

      Focus on specific PLANS for courses. Ie, new courses you’d develop AND basic intro/generalist courses and how you’d handle them, pref. in innovative ways.

      Reply
      • Kate says

        December 6, 2012 at 11:12 am

        yes, but how does one demonstrate evidence of success?

        Reply
        • Dave says

          November 3, 2013 at 5:09 am

          Hi Kate,
          thanks for posting that question. I have taught only one course at adjunct level and so, in applying for tenure-track, I have the same question. Has there been any reply to this?

          Reply
        • Karen says

          November 4, 2013 at 10:53 am

          Oh–you can’t! obviously you can’t give “evidence” of success until you ahve said evidence. But the soundness of your proposed syllabus and methods explained in the TS also count as evidence in a broader sense.

          Reply
    • Claudie says

      August 8, 2013 at 5:09 pm

      MG,
      I have the same concern and question ? What should I focus on since I am new to the teaching career and don’t have teaching experience which may unable me to be concrete on my statement. How do I approach this part in my statement? I wonder..

      Reply
  6. Jeff says

    October 6, 2012 at 2:13 pm

    Quick question: should the teaching statement be on official department letterhead, or is a simple PDF appropriate? On that topic, what generally should and should not be on official letterhead?

    Thanks so much for this blog! It’s INCREDIBLY helpful to this bewildered PhD candidate.

    Reply
    • Karen says

      October 6, 2012 at 6:08 pm

      Only the cover letter is on letterhead. Everything else is plain old printer paper.

      Reply
  7. Jeff says

    October 23, 2012 at 12:05 pm

    Hi,

    in Error #2, you mention to write about “evidence that the strategies were effective”. What evidence should be used?

    Thank you

    Reply
  8. Debora says

    November 6, 2012 at 2:44 pm

    I find it confusing when an application asks for your teaching philosophy to be addressed in the cover letter. Does that just mean “talk about your teaching” or does it mean… do the usual teaching stuff and give us a paragraph on philosophy (my cover letter, having been Karen-ized, is not about my philosophy it is about my teaching abilities).

    Reply
  9. Two-timer says

    November 26, 2012 at 1:52 pm

    I completely agree with this point. The 5-paragraph essay is taught for a reason. However, some of us are often led astray by those in charge of helping us. My department is VERY GOOD at preparing grad students for the market…except when it comes to teaching philosophies. My teaching philosophy is tell-y rather than show-y because I was specifically told to remove the examples to the second paragraph (yes, two paragraphs only). The reason given was: “these are so ridiculous to read that you want the reader to get the “philosophy” part, and if they’re still reading, then they get the examples.” Ass backwards. But that was better than the other response: “who reads these anyway?” Well, at SLACs, I am sure they read it. Our profs have blind spots that sometimes lead us into perdition.

    Reply
  10. Kate says

    December 6, 2012 at 11:11 am

    This is all great advice, however, what if one is applying for a teaching job right out of grad school? How can I demonstrate my past teaching strategies and successes if I have none (at least in the higher ed classroom setting) to speak of?

    Reply
    • TB says

      August 2, 2016 at 1:57 am

      I have the same question. I used to teach in School level before this and dont have much college level teaching experiance other than instructing trainees / interns.

      Reply
  11. Kaye says

    January 18, 2013 at 4:01 pm

    My challenge with summarising teaching evaluations is that they do not use a consistent scale. I’ve taught twice (at 2 universities), TAed 5 times (in two departments), for which I have 4 evaluations using three different scales (one department used 1 as excellent one year and 5 the next). The criteria are also not the same from year to year. Is it okay to only present average scores (which I convert to a five point scale so that they are all comparable)?

    Reply
    • Karen says

      January 18, 2013 at 6:10 pm

      yes, that’s fine.

      Reply
  12. EFM says

    May 17, 2013 at 1:17 pm

    Prof. Karen, don’t yell at me, I think I know the answer, but….

    I have seen teaching statements that include (inspirational) quotes from important figures within the discipline that apply to teaching. It seems weepy – to borrow your word – but it does frame your teaching within your discipline’s raison d’etre. E.g., social work –> Jane Addams

    Would you throw my tenure-track job application out the window if my teaching statement included a quote? Thanks!

    Reply
  13. Andrea says

    August 30, 2013 at 2:11 pm

    Could you write a few sentences which would improve the bad example given in #2 above? How would you show instead of tell for that particular wordy example about multimedia materials?

    Reply
    • Meg says

      October 3, 2013 at 6:34 am

      I was wondering the same thing. In the last paragraph for point #2, it’s listed what should be done, but the example given seems to do all of those things. I don’t see a distinction between showing and telling. It would be helpful to have an example of each for comparison.

      Reply
  14. ughworthy says

    January 10, 2014 at 2:28 pm

    Does each individual component of an application packet need to stand on its own? That is, do I need to re-introduce my research interests in my teaching statement as if its the first they’re reading of it or can I relate back to other parts of the application package?

    Reply
  15. JAS says

    February 20, 2014 at 10:44 pm

    These were the directions I was given: “Describe your approach to developing students’ capacities in critical thinking, writing, discussion and analysis. Provide examples of how you would lead a discussion seminar for freshmen on a text or topic from two courses that you identified in liberal education.”

    Reply
  16. Mark says

    July 15, 2014 at 1:29 pm

    While the information in this posting is helpful, the hubris and nasty tone in which it is written is just…tiring. Why do academics always have to have such attitudes. The nastiness just has not equivalent in other places.

    Meh, the problem is the utterly warped supply and demand equation.

    Reply
    • Gigi says

      January 22, 2015 at 1:19 am

      Not only that, but the tone of the post seems to suggest these teaching philosophies are a waste of time for the committee and for the applicants.

      Which, y’know, raises the question: why are they still included as one of the hoops you have to jump through?

      (Oh, wait. The answer’s in the question, isn’t it? Academia loves its hoops.)

      Reply
    • Quinn says

      June 14, 2022 at 3:54 pm

      Completely agree with your reply! And the irony of this blog post is that the replies to people’s comments and questions about drafting the Teaching Statement is to refer to the book: “The Professor is in: The Essential Guide To Turning Your PhD Into a Job.”
      Well…I bought the book and read it cover-to-cover and the only portion of the book that discusses the Teaching Statement is a chapter entitled: “Just Say No to the Weepy Teaching Statement” (Chp. 25). This chapter essentially reiterates this blog post and insults women with derogatory undertones and generalized pejorative statements concerning female emotionality and “highly feminized” writing styles; proceeds to lambaste an anonymous female candidate’s “particularly awful” Teaching Statement; and then completely FAILS to provide instruction or a constructive example of what constitutes a GOOD Teaching Statement. Overall, I guess the major takeaway and lesson learned after buying and reading this is: “Just Say No to this Book.”

      Reply
  17. EP says

    August 8, 2014 at 3:20 pm

    I am a graduate student in a field and in a department with limited teaching opportunities for PhD students beyond being a TA. I have sought out what few things there are (working as a writing tutor, teaching in a summer program), and these are represented in my statement. But I have not had much experience teaching my own courses, and as such, when citing examples of teaching effectiveness in my statement, I am finding that they sound lackluster — TAs only have so much room to innovate in a 50min discussion section in which the assignments and course objectives are determined by faculty, so it’s not like I’m reinventing the craft of teaching when I plan a debate for my students, or have them post reading reviews and discussion questions on an online forum for the class.

    These things were effective in my classrooms, and I have some evidence (anecdotal, as well as from evaluations) that my students responded well to them. But they’re pretty run of the mill as far as I can tell, and I’m concerned that they will read as such…the same crap grad students always put in these statements to show how “innovative” they are in the classroom.

    Your thoughts?

    Reply
  18. The forever visiting professor says

    August 28, 2014 at 11:53 am

    Dear Karen,
    I have been concentrating so much in my other materials over the past years that I have never made deep revisions to my teaching statement. Now that I read this, I realize how terribly formulaic my statement was. Re-working on it right now. On a positive note, I found a couple of sentences right at the midle of it that were pure gold. I now know that I may be “that professor who uses strategic confusion in her classes”. I’m glad I had at least something concrete! Thank you for the posts!

    Reply
  19. TGP says

    September 1, 2014 at 6:09 pm

    Dr. Karen,

    Thank you for this post, it really helped a lot. I am currently on the fourth or fifth iteration of my teaching statement (have been a visiting professor since 2011). By now I have worked out all (most!) of the hackneyed garbage, but I was still writing it very much like the life story of my teaching. Your advice to write it more as an essay has helped immensely. Many thanks.

    Reply
  20. Filippo says

    November 26, 2014 at 6:38 am

    Hello and thanks for the tips,
    how can one follow an evidence-based schema if one is applying for a Lecturership and therefore they might not have thought any class yet?

    Reply
    • Karen says

      November 26, 2014 at 3:54 pm

      Give detailed examplesof what you would like to teach; you need to “think of classes” now!

      Reply
  21. Eaton says

    December 11, 2014 at 11:09 am

    Thank you so much for the very helpful advices! May I ask one question? For an applicant who does not have experience of teaching a real course,what would the “evidence-based” be substituted with to make the TS still sound and stand out?

    Reply
  22. Teaching personal statements says

    June 1, 2015 at 11:45 pm

    Thank you very much. It helped me a lot.

    Reply
  23. Jason says

    October 9, 2015 at 10:47 am

    I have enjoyed reading your posts as I work on this season’s applications. In your frequent insistence on brevity, you do not say if your one page, 12 pt, New Times Roman, one inch margin pages are single-spaced or double-spaced. Sorry to sound like such an undergrad, but it changes things by a factor of two!

    Reply
    • Karen says

      October 10, 2015 at 9:09 pm

      always single spaced.

      Reply
  24. Carrie says

    November 22, 2015 at 10:45 pm

    Hi Karen,

    I am a PhD student working on a teaching statement and was referred here as a resource by a professor. I was a little taken aback by your errors #5 and #6. I know that sexism is common in academia, and I am happy to see that acknowledged here. However I was also bothered by the implication that women are inherently more emotional than men, and that expressions of traditional ‘femininity’ do not belong in tenure track positions. I had hoped that in 2015 we had moved beyond such narrow views of gender and success in academia. I’d love to hear your thoughts on this!

    Thanks,
    Carrie

    Reply
    • Karen says

      November 23, 2015 at 10:30 am

      I just say what I see. Women clients do this way more than men.

      Reply
      • someone says

        February 16, 2018 at 2:04 pm

        way to promote an ideology of aggressive masculinity under the guise of feminism, Karen.

        Reply
  25. Kim says

    February 23, 2016 at 2:47 am

    Hi Karen,
    I am about to submit an application for a job that requests teaching evaluations be uploading. When I was a graduate TA I was evaluated, but I never received copies of those teaching evaluations. I am now teaching in Master´s program abroad, but I would like return to the States. The program does not have teaching evaluations. What could I do?
    Thank you,
    Kim

    Reply
  26. Atousa says

    August 17, 2016 at 12:34 pm

    Great article but I don’t like and don’t agree with the facts that you associate to women! Terms like: ” highly feminized,” “classic female perennial one-year replacement adjunct” and “female humbleness” are examples of common misbeliefs that hurt women in in academia (and in general outside of academia).

    Here I elaborate my opinion on these statements:

    1) Humble and emotional writing downgrades our writing regardless of being a man or a woman. But unfortunately because of these misbeliefs, humbleness and emotions are more noticed when women do it and it is immediately linked to their gender. So if women make these mistakes, they are hurt more than if men do it.
    2) The term “highly feminized” is being used here as a negative statement. There is nothing wrong with being feminine!
    3) “classic female perennial one-year replacement adjunct”?! There is no need to have the word “female” in this statement. Besides, this is not a classic picture of a woman that I have in mind.

    From the commments, it looks like by adding words like “female” and “woman” you wanted to mention that these mistakes are more common between women than men. That may be true but the way you say them you imply more than that. The impression that reader gets from reading these statements (or at least I got) are the ones that I explained above.

    This article is about how to change our language to increase effectiveness in writing. The hiring committees consist of both men and women. Changing our language about women is an important step toward effective writing.

    Reply
    • Andi says

      October 1, 2016 at 8:56 am

      I completely agree with this comment, and I am glad that these concerns were articulated. I also have a problem with this notion that “highly feminized” or “female” trans. “passive” voice may hurt an applicant. This may have been true for many years, but this is not the case in 2016. This is complicity with the system. I would challenge the author and her readers not to imply that “professional” = “masculine”.

      Reply
  27. Ben Hying says

    September 8, 2016 at 9:57 am

    What should somebody with no experience write as a teaching statement?

    Reply
  28. Maya says

    October 11, 2016 at 1:18 pm

    Dear Karen,
    I can guess what you might say but I need to hear it: is it permissible to include a teaching portfolio that includes 2 sample syllabi and a few evals when you are asked for a teaching statement?
    Thanks so much! Yours, on the market

    Reply
    • Karen says

      October 12, 2016 at 6:45 am

      No.

      Reply
  29. Thomas DeLucil says

    July 27, 2017 at 9:49 am

    Do you have any advice for applicants who need to describe their teaching both in language classes, and content courses? It doesn’t seem like there’s much overlap between them other than what is common to all teaching. 1/2 a page each? Do they need to be linked?

    Reply
  30. Amy L. Michaud-Wells says

    February 2, 2018 at 10:38 am

    Great article! I am ashamed to admit that I purchased your book while I was a doctoral student, but I didn’t read it. Since I am now looking to change my career path, I will definitely start reading it tonight!
    Thank you!

    Reply
    • Karen says

      February 2, 2018 at 5:14 pm

      I’m glad!

      Reply
  31. someone says

    February 16, 2018 at 2:01 pm

    I’d take your advise more seriously if it were not so full of typos.

    Reply
    • someone says

      February 16, 2018 at 3:21 pm

      and yest I know that my comment included a typo, but I am not posing as a know it all or asking anyone to take my advice seriously

      Reply
  32. Lil says

    April 18, 2018 at 5:20 pm

    If the following is the “Tell” version then what would the “Show” re-write look like? Everyone can always point to what they don’t like and give bad examples, but on almost every website I’ve seen, they can’t give examples of good writing.

    “I always like to use multi-media materials in the classroom. I first discovered the value of these when I taught ‘Introduction to Cultural Anthropology’ at the Eastern Tennessee State last spring. In that class I had the opportunity to use a wide range of videos and online materials. Students told me that they really loved these, and I came to feel that these are excellent methods for promoting in-class discussions. I plan to use them in future classes as well.”

    Reply
    • Karen says

      April 19, 2018 at 9:22 am

      Read my book, The Professor Is In: The Essential Guide To Turning Your PhD Into a Job (about $12) for lots of good examples.

      Reply
  33. Rena says

    June 30, 2018 at 9:00 am

    Hi Karen,
    Can you clarify what you mean re: starting the teaching statement: “articulate a wide general good that can be achieved through university pedagogy at its broadest level”

    Reply
  34. LW says

    September 28, 2019 at 10:24 am

    How might advice for a “statement of teaching interests” differ from the above?

    Reply
    • Karen Kelsky says

      October 2, 2019 at 10:53 am

      lol, not at all!

      Reply
  35. SHANNON LYNN NIX says

    June 25, 2020 at 4:51 pm

    Hi! What are your fees and information re: creating and editing a teaching summary?

    Reply
    • Karen Kelsky says

      June 26, 2020 at 2:16 pm

      Please email me at gettenure@gmail.com to learn about fees and how to work with us.

      Reply

Trackbacks

  1. How To Tailor a Job Letter (Without Flattering, Pandering, or Begging) | says:
    September 19, 2011 at 11:03 am

    […] Today’s post is going to address the difficult matter of tailoring a job letter. In the work my clients do on their johb market materials, it seems that nothing gives them as much trouble as the one small paragraph, in their job letters, tailored to the job. (Well, nothing, maybe, except the dreaded teaching statement, discussed last Friday). […]

    Reply
  2. What is Evidence of Teaching Excellence? | says:
    September 23, 2011 at 8:29 am

    […] will not go into the reasons why here. I simply refer you to a recent post, The Dreaded Teaching Statement: 8 Pitfalls, that goes deeply into the subject. Please read this post closely and subject your teaching […]

    Reply
  3. ProfHacker - The Chronicle of Higher Education says:
    October 3, 2011 at 6:31 pm

    […] Kelsky offers advice on fixing your job letter, lists eight pitfalls that frequently plague teaching statements, and considers what counts as evidence of teaching […]

    Reply
  4. What British-Trained Candidates Are Doing Wrong on the U.S. Job Market (And some c.v. advice for everyone) | says:
    November 13, 2011 at 11:51 am

    […] I got excellent evaluations.” The I statement narrative is equally deadly, as I describe here. and here.  But it is quite possible to write in the active voice without falling prey to an […]

    Reply
  5. This Christmas, Don’t Be Cheap | says:
    December 13, 2011 at 12:18 pm

    […] statement, which are always susceptible to hyper-emotionalism anyway, as I describe in the post The Dreaded Teaching Statement: Eight Pitfalls.  The typical culprit sentence is:  “This assignment produces some incredible student […]

    Reply
  6. What Inside Candidates Persist in Doing Wrong | says:
    January 5, 2012 at 9:13 am

    […] insider candidates: everything that I write in my posts about how to write a cover letter, and a teaching statement, and tailor a letter, and articulate a second project (this one in particular!!!), and how to handle […]

    Reply
  7. Dr. Karen’s Rules of the Research Statement | The Professor Is In says:
    August 30, 2012 at 3:09 pm

    […] in short, the Research Statement, just like the Teaching Statement, needs to be one page in length.  And like the TS, it needs to be in 11 or 12 point font, and have […]

    Reply
  8. The Teaching Statement | Ph.D.s and Pedagogy says:
    October 28, 2013 at 5:38 am

    […] The Professor Is In: http://theprofessorisin.com/2011/09/16/thedreadedteachingstatement/ […]

    Reply
  9. Teaching Philosophies, CVs, Interest Statements – all the same and boring | OMG – Homework! says:
    November 18, 2013 at 7:53 am

    […] (http://theprofessorisin.com/2011/09/16/thedreadedteachingstatement/) […]

    Reply
  10. Teaching Statements…The Take Aways | Becoming The Giving Tree says:
    December 1, 2013 at 11:46 am

    […] http://theprofessorisin.com/2011/09/16/thedreadedteachingstatement/ […]

    Reply
  11. Just get better at writing okay? (me too) | Marenated says:
    January 9, 2014 at 2:32 pm

    […] But a statement like “Employee engagement is important to companies” should not exist. That is one step up from Hooked on Phonics worked for me, […]

    Reply
  12. Teaching Philosophies, Debts, and Good Teachers | Natalie Strobach says:
    January 30, 2014 at 10:26 am

    […] to share samples is like recovering burnt scrolls from the Library of Alexandria. I found some wonderful advice over at The Professor is In where she goes over the eight main pitfalls she sees in client drafts. You should read the post. […]

    Reply
  13. So you want to teach | ucdneuroscience says:
    May 15, 2014 at 11:38 pm

    […] you know that Teaching Statements are often a part of application for professorships? Up until recently I did not. Now that I […]

    Reply
  14. The Teaching-Centric Letter | The Professor Is In says:
    November 7, 2014 at 2:50 pm

    […] that a position does indeed require a teaching-centric letter, then begin by reading the blog posts The Dreaded Teaching Statement: 8 Pitfalls, The Weepy Teaching Statement, Just Say No, Teaching: Not When and Where but What and How  and […]

    Reply
  15. Teaching philosophy | future capable says:
    June 11, 2015 at 10:21 pm

    […] it should contain. I used my Google-fu and found some instructions (e.g., this), some templates, lists of things to avoid, and some exemplars (this one was a lovely visual representation, I thought). Me being me, I even […]

    Reply
  16. Some Statements about Teaching Statements | The Craft of Teaching in the Academic Study of Religion says:
    March 21, 2016 at 10:03 am

    […] common formulae and pitfalls that you may well be aware of (see, e.g., Karen Kelsky’s warnings here).  It’s always worth keeping in mind that members of a search committee will likely be at least […]

    Reply
  17. What to Include in a Student Teaching Portfolio says:
    June 28, 2016 at 9:25 am

    […] of the most important items to include is your personal teaching statement. This answers the questions “what does teaching and learning mean to you?” and “how do you […]

    Reply
  18. Dr. Karen’s Rules of the Research Statement | The Professor Is In says:
    September 17, 2016 at 12:02 pm

    […] ← The Dreaded Teaching Statement: Eight Pitfalls […]

    Reply
  19. December is the least wonderful time of year for job-seeking academics - At Online says:
    December 24, 2016 at 11:36 pm

    […] which literal books have been written: the meticulously tailored cover letters; the insipid statements of teaching philosophy; the earnest plans for a third, fourth, and fifth imaginary book; reams of teaching […]

    Reply
  20. Using Your Students’ Evaluations says:
    January 10, 2019 at 6:25 pm

    […] student evaluations can be helpful when it comes time to writing your teaching statement for employers. If you’re having trouble summarizing your strengths or identifying ways […]

    Reply
  21. Using Your Students’ Evaluations | Inside Higher Ed - Loved Workplace says:
    January 11, 2019 at 7:20 pm

    […] student evaluations can be helpful when it comes time to writing your teaching statement for employers. If you’re having trouble summarizing your strengths or identifying ways you’ve […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Buy My Book!

4.8 stars on Amazon!

The_Professor_Is_In.indd

Get Immediate Help

In addition to our blog and book, we have upcoming live webinars, pre-recorded webinars and other programs that you can get started on right away:

The Art of the Academic Cover Letter
The Art of the Article
Unstuck: The Art of Productivity
Quick Reviews
Free Productivity Webinars

Categories

  • #MeTooPhD
  • Academic Job Search
    • How To Choose and Manage Recommenders
    • How to Interview
    • How To Write Academic Job Cover Letters
    • How To Write CVs
    • Landing Your Tenure Track Job
    • Major Job Market Mistakes
    • Negotiating Offers
  • Adjunct Issues
  • Advising Advice
  • Alt-University Critique
  • Black Lives Matter
  • COVID19
  • Dispatches
  • Goodbye Ivory Towers
  • Graduate Student Concerns
    • Bad Advisors and Good Mentors
  • How To Do Conferences
  • How to Get Grants and Fellowships
  • International Perspectives
  • Intersectional Analyses
  • Makeup
  • Marginalized Voices
  • Mental Health and Academia
  • Ph.D. Poverty
  • Podcast
  • Post-Ac Free-Lancing and Small Business
  • Post-Ac Job Search
    • Careers Outside
  • Postdoc Issues
  • Productivity
    • Book Proposals and Contracts
    • Publishing Issues
    • Writing
  • Promote Yourself!
  • Quitting–An Excellent Option
  • Racism in the Academy
  • Rearview Mirror
  • Resumes & Postac Docs
  • Sexual Harassment in the Academy
  • Shame
  • Stop.Acting.Like.A.Grad.Student
  • Strategizing Your Success in Academia
  • Teaching and Research Statements
  • Teaching Demos
  • Teaching Portfolios
  • Tenure–How To Get It
    • How To Build Your Tenure File
    • Surviving Assistant Professorhood
  • The Campus Visit
  • Unstuck
  • Webinars
  • What Not To Wear
  • Women of Color in Academia
  • Work/Life Balance in Academia
  • Yes, You Can: Women in Academia
  • Your Second and Third Jobs

Footer

About Us

  • Who Is Dr. Karen?
  • Who Is On the TPII Team?
  • In The News
  • Contact Me
  • FAQs
    • Why Trust Me?
  • Testimonials

Community

  • #MeTooPhD
  • Peer Editing
  • PhD Debt Survey
  • Support Fund
  • I Help With Custody Cases for Academics

Copyright © 2023 The Professor Is In·

We Are Redefining Academic Community

That’s why we upgraded our private
Mighty Network.

We are committed to building a community with a focus on productivity support. Every day, in a dedicated space, we offer free coaching advice and encouragement. And the couple thousand people who have already joined are steadily building a supportive and interactive community devoted to that elusive idea of work-life balance.

Learn More

Get on Dr. Karen's Schedule

Get on my schedule to work on your tenure track job cover letter, CV, grant applications, book proposals, interview preparation, and more.  [si-contact-form form=’2′]