• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

The Professor Is In

Guidance for all things PhD: Graduate School, Job Market and Careers

  • Home
  • Courses & Webinars
    • How To …
    • The Art of the Academic Cover Letter
    • The Art of the Article
    • Unstuck: The Art of Productivity
    • On Demand Courses
    • Upcoming Live Webinars
    • Free Productivity Webinars
    • Gift Certificates
  • Personalized Job App Help
    • Document Editing
    • Quick Reviews
    • Specials
    • Interview Prep
    • Personal Negotiating Assistance
    • One on One Career Consults
    • Testimonials
    • Interview Testimonials
    • Graduate School Application Assistance
  • The Professor Is /Out/
    • It’s OK to Quit
    • Our Art of Leaving Program
    • Prof Is OUT Services
    • Our Prof Is OUT Team
    • Prof is OUT Client Testimonials
    • Ex-Academics: A TPIO Support Community
  • Workshops
  • Coaching
    • Pre-Tenure Coaching Group
    • Leaving Academia Coaching Group
  • Blog
  • Podcast

An Example Public R1 Departmental Tenure Timeline

By Karen Kelsky | June 25, 2018

Number 5 in my series on tenure.

After my previous posts The Path and Timeline of Your Tenure File, and The Role of Your Tenure Committee and Department Head, a reader sent in a timeline document of the Department Head’s duties in the tenure process that circulates at her Public R1 social sciences department.  I share it here (slightly anonymized) as more data for you to consider. Note that it stops at the departmental level and doesn’t include processes at the college and campus level. Note also that unlike the process I described, this one includes places for the candidate to respond in writing to the reports. I’d appreciate knowing from readers how common that practice is.

And remember, all tenure processes are local, and general advice such as that I provide in my blog post series on tenure cannot substitute for careful research of written and unwritten practices in your own field, department, and institution.


Timeline for Promotion Packages for Assistant Professors

NOVEMBER

  1. Meet with Assistant Professor, discuss general expectations for process

(a) personal statement, provide examples by previous Asst Profs

(b) timeline

(c) potential internal review committee members

  1. Name review committee.

JANUARY

  1. Meet with Assistant Professor, begin formal process

(a) Ask for first draft of personal statement from candidate by February 10

(b) Ask to think about potential external reviewers

FEBRUARY

  1. Assistant Professor, Department Chair, and Review Committee Chair discuss potential external reviewers

MARCH

  1. Assistant Professor finalizes personal statement by March 25

APRIL

  1. Candidate supplies 1 photocopy of all research materials (articles, chapters, books) on April 1
  • Dept staff keeps master copy, makes one copy for dept review committee
  • Dept staff make copies for external reviewers.
  • Dept buys any needed book copies for external reviews
  1. Candidate supplies 1 photocopy of all teaching materials (classes taught, peer and student evaluations, syllabi).
  • Dept staff keeps master copy, makes one copy for dept review committee
  • Dept staff make copies for external reviewers.
  1. Candidate supplies 1 photocopy of additional materials: personal statement, CV, YARS [KK: I assume this means yearly annual research statements].
  2. All materials go to the internal review committee, with deadline of initial response to chair May 10
  3. Contact possible external reviewers by email (contact 5; need 3)
  • Packets to them by May 15 and would need to hear back by September 1
  • This is query letter, not formal letter dictated by the College
  • If all 5 don’t say yes, then take next names from lists

MAY

  1. On May 15, send out official letters of review request, research materials, candidate’s personal statement, and candidate’s CV to external reviewers. Request letters by September 1.

AUGUST

  1. On August 10, send email checking in, remind external reviewers of letter return by September 1.
  2. When letters arrive, keep original in dept materials, give copies to the review committee chair.

SEPTEMBER

  1. On September 15, final report received from review committee (with references to external reviews)
  2. Provide review report to candidate (with references to external reviewers redacted).
  3. Candidate has one week to respond. Some response is required — anything from got it, read it, thank you, to offering corrections, responses, clarifications.
  • Candidate’s response included in package for full faculty and College Council

SEPTEMBER-OCTOBER

  1. Faculty have 10 days to review full package.
  1. Faculty meet, discuss, vote.
  2. Synopsis of this discussion provided to candidate.
  3. Candidate has one week to respond. Some response is required — same as earlier
  • Candidate’s response included in package for College Council
  1. Chair writes letter: includes faculty discussion and vote, and own assessment

OCTOBER

  1. All materials assembled, copies made, delivered to the College (usually by October 15).
  • Master copy retained in dept.

Similar Posts:

  • The Path and Timeline of Your Tenure Application
  • Hooray for Elite White Men! External Reviewers for Tenure
  • Your External Reviewers for Tenure
  • Here’s What Goes in Your Tenure Portfolio–A Special Request Post
  • The Role of Your Tenure Committee and Department Head

Filed Under: How To Build Your Tenure File, Strategizing Your Success in Academia, Tenure--How To Get It

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Laura says

    June 27, 2018 at 6:07 am

    This timeline looks almost exactly like what we’re told to expect at my R1 public institution, but with more (very helpful) detail. One difference: “Dept buys any needed book copies for external reviews.” Lucky them! We have to buy all the books ourselves. Obviously the security of tenure outweighs this expense, but it does strain the month-to-month budget.

    Reply
  2. Emily says

    May 30, 2019 at 11:10 am

    The process is similar but timeline is different at my R1: it all occurs within a single academic year, September-June.

    September: meet with chair, provide them list of possible external reviewers, draft of tenure statements. Department elects internal committee members.

    October: file is compiled, edited and polished. Internal committee begins teaching observations.

    November: file goes out to external reviewers, but candidate can continue to add to it for review by internal committee. Teaching observations continue.

    December: File closes, no further additions except in exceptional circumstances. Meeting with department head for early annual evaluation so it can be included in the file. External letters are due.

    January: Internal committee meets and votes, writes a letter summarizing their findings/decision. Department chair writes a cover letter. Candidate has 3 business days to respond to each. File is sent on to the Dean’s office and College committee.

    March: Dean and College committee submit letters for the file. Candidate has 3 business days to respond.

    April: University Committee votes. Provost’s office signs off on successful cases.

    June: Regents board vote on tenure and promotion cases.

    Reply
    • Karen Kelsky says

      June 5, 2019 at 11:42 am

      Thanks. Always good to have a sense of the variation in practices.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Buy My Book!

4.8 stars on Amazon!

The_Professor_Is_In.indd

Get Immediate Help

In addition to our blog and book, we have upcoming live webinars, pre-recorded webinars and other programs that you can get started on right away:

The Art of the Academic Cover Letter
The Art of the Article
Unstuck: The Art of Productivity
Quick Reviews
Free Productivity Webinars

Categories

  • #MeTooPhD
  • Academic Job Search
    • How To Choose and Manage Recommenders
    • How to Interview
    • How To Write Academic Job Cover Letters
    • How To Write CVs
    • Landing Your Tenure Track Job
    • Major Job Market Mistakes
    • Negotiating Offers
  • Adjunct Issues
  • Advising Advice
  • Alt-University Critique
  • Black Lives Matter
  • COVID19
  • Dispatches
  • Goodbye Ivory Towers
  • Graduate Student Concerns
    • Bad Advisors and Good Mentors
  • How To Do Conferences
  • How to Get Grants and Fellowships
  • International Perspectives
  • Intersectional Analyses
  • Makeup
  • Marginalized Voices
  • Mental Health and Academia
  • Ph.D. Poverty
  • Podcast
  • Post-Ac Free-Lancing and Small Business
  • Post-Ac Job Search
    • Careers Outside
  • Postdoc Issues
  • Productivity
    • Book Proposals and Contracts
    • Publishing Issues
    • Writing
  • Promote Yourself!
  • Quitting–An Excellent Option
  • Racism in the Academy
  • Rearview Mirror
  • Resumes & Postac Docs
  • Sexual Harassment in the Academy
  • Shame
  • Stop.Acting.Like.A.Grad.Student
  • Strategizing Your Success in Academia
  • Teaching and Research Statements
  • Teaching Demos
  • Teaching Portfolios
  • Tenure–How To Get It
    • How To Build Your Tenure File
    • Surviving Assistant Professorhood
  • The Campus Visit
  • Unstuck
  • Webinars
  • What Not To Wear
  • Women of Color in Academia
  • Work/Life Balance in Academia
  • Yes, You Can: Women in Academia
  • Your Second and Third Jobs

Footer

About Us

  • Who Is Dr. Karen?
  • Who Is On the TPII Team?
  • In The News
  • Contact Me
  • FAQs
    • Why Trust Me?
  • Testimonials

Community

  • #MeTooPhD
  • Peer Editing
  • PhD Debt Survey
  • Support Fund
  • I Help With Custody Cases for Academics

Copyright © 2023 The Professor Is In·