• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

The Professor Is In

Guidance for all things PhD: Graduate School, Job Market and Careers

  • Home
  • Immediate Support
    • The Art of the Academic Cover Letter
    • The Art of the Article
    • Unstuck: The Art of Productivity
    • Consultations and More
    • Quick Reviews
    • Webinar Recordings
    • Upcoming Live Webinars
    • Free Productivity Webinars
    • Gift Certificates
  • Individual Help
    • Document Editing
      • Testimonials
    • Interview Prep
      • Interview Testimonials
    • One on One Career Consults
    • University Workshops
    • Graduate School Application Assistance
  • Beyond Tenure Track
    • It’s OK to Quit
    • Moving On Coaching Help
    • Our Moving On Team
    • Testimonials from Post-ac Clients
  • The Blog
  • The Podcast
  • Merch!

Banish These Words, 2016 Edition

By Karen Kelsky | October 7, 2016

Every season I note a new batch of trite, overused words cropping up in job and grant documents. I’ve already written about some of the most critical to banish from your vocabulary here, and here. Here is the newest set of words that need to go.

The first three are related to my post “adjectives are not arguments”. In my book, I elaborate on this issue: “The simple repetition of the words on this list, over and over in your documents, does not suggest that you have a coherent project, or make a compelling point, or advance an original argument. (…)They are white noise, and devoid of meaning.”

Innovative- If you have to say it, it ain’t so. Hardly anything in the academy is innovative, and if it is, then you should let your research speak for itself.

Rich- “Rich” is actually something that I call a “cheap” adjective. It doesn’t really tell us anything about your data, your project, your book, and it is incredibly vague. What exactly, is rich about the data? Unless you talk about money, don’t use this adjective.

Provocative-This often goes together with “innovative.” I know, I know, you’re a rebel. But, really, if you have or are getting a Ph.D., you’re as much of a rebel as Green Day are punk rock. And that’s ok- the one thing the academy is not looking for is rebels. They are looking for an intelligent colleague who will work with them.

On to nouns:

Thrust (in any lexical variation):  see my previous post on “deep”. Just no.

Lacuna- it’s pretentious, and nothing else. Using lacuna doesn’t make you look smarter, it doesn’t make your research better. See my post on grad student grandiosity.

Lacuna Matata, Kelsky out.

Similar Posts:

  • We Don’t Need Your New Perspective
  • Adjectives Are Not Arguments, Part I
  • I-Me-My
  • Your Academic Cover Letter – The Second Project Paragraph
  • Data Point, Data Point, Data Point…

Filed Under: How To Write Academic Job Cover Letters, How To Write CVs, Landing Your Tenure Track Job, Major Job Market Mistakes, Strategizing Your Success in Academia, Writing

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. OG says

    October 7, 2016 at 1:57 pm

    I don’t understand what’s wrong with lacuna. Isn’t it just another word for gap? Do you recommend using gap instead? Surely there are gaps in knowledge that research seeks to remedy, no?

    Reply
    • Kalani says

      November 20, 2016 at 7:55 pm

      1) It’s pretentious. Write to express, never to impress. There is no reason to write lacuna instead of gap, ever. End of story. Just take Karen’s advice on this.
      2) From my perspective, even “gap” still comes across as too strong. You’re inviting someone to find an article or work that even remotely fits. Not every research gap needs to be filled. You can never go wrong with underexplored or something similar.

      Reply
  2. TaylorP says

    October 11, 2016 at 6:54 pm

    Here’s one that is now over used: “leverage” or “leveraged.” I swear everything I read these days is about leveraging this or that. Everyone seems to think it makes them sound so smart or emphasizes their business acumen. It’s sad that humans do this to words.

    Reply
  3. elaine says

    February 17, 2017 at 1:56 am

    Good call on Green Day

    Reply
  4. EMS says

    September 16, 2017 at 7:42 am

    What about a “temporally rich dataset” or “spatially rich dataset?” These phrases are indeed telling us what is rich about the data. I guess “dense” would be another option, but “rich” doesn’t seem inherently more “devoid of meaning” to me.

    Reply
  5. Melissa says

    September 15, 2019 at 1:05 pm

    Who is using the word “thrust?”

    Reply
    • Karen Kelsky says

      September 16, 2019 at 10:35 am

      So.Many.People.

      Reply
  6. Daniel Pfau says

    December 31, 2019 at 3:57 pm

    Lacuna ‘anata’, such a wonderful space. Lacuna ‘anata’ it means a pause in phrase. So there’s no matrix near that chondrocyte! It’s our fiber free, physiology…Lacuna ‘anata’!–I promise this is not on my job docs haha and thank you for this resource!

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Buy My Book!

4.8 stars on Amazon!

The_Professor_Is_In.indd

AOCLlogoFast, Individualized, Affordable

A 10-module, self-guided course, all-online, available anytime 24/7, that walks you step by step through the planning, info-gathering, writing, and editing of your academic job cover letter.

Read More Here

Recent Posts

  • Ivory Towers in The Rearview Mirror: Kate Krueger
  • The Zoom Teaching Demo: Eight Guideposts
  • #Dispatches – What Will You Do When The Pandemic Is Truly Over?
  • Ivory Towers in The Rearview Mirror: Lindsay Barone
  • You Belong

Categories

  • #MeTooPhD
  • #Resistance
  • Academic Job Search
    • Administrator positions
    • How To Choose and Manage Recommenders
    • How to Interview
    • How To Write Academic Job Cover Letters
    • How To Write CVs
    • Landing Your Tenure Track Job
    • Major Job Market Mistakes
    • Negotiating Offers
  • Adjunct Issues
  • Advising Advice
  • Alt-Ac Job Search
    • Careers Outside
  • Alt-University Critique
  • Black Lives Matter
  • Christian Colleges
  • Coronavirus
  • COVID19
    • Adapting
  • Dispatches
  • Goodbye Ivory Towers
  • Graduate Student Concerns
    • Bad Advisors and Good Mentors
  • How To Do Conferences
  • How to Get Grants and Fellowships
  • International Perspectives
  • Internet and Social Media
  • Intersectional Analyses
  • Makeup
  • Marginalized Voices
  • Mental Illness and Academia
  • Ph.D. Poverty
  • Podcast
  • Post-Ac Free-Lancing and Small Business
  • Postdoc Issues
  • Productivity
    • Book Proposals and Contracts
    • Publishing Issues
    • Writing
  • Promote Yourself!
  • Quitting–An Excellent Option
  • Racism in the Academy
  • Rearview Mirror
  • Resumes & Postac Docs
  • Sexual Harassment in the Academy
  • Shame
  • Stop.Acting.Like.A.Grad.Student
  • Strategizing Your Success in Academia
  • Teaching and Research Statements
  • Teaching Demos
  • Teaching Portfolios
  • Tenure–How To Get It
    • How To Build Your Tenure File
    • Surviving Assistant Professorhood
  • The Campus Visit
  • Unstuck
  • Webinars
  • What Not To Wear
  • Women of Color in Academia
  • Work/Life Balance in Academia
  • Yes, You Can: Women in Academia
  • Your Second and Third Jobs

Footer

About Us

  • Who Is Dr. Karen?
  • Who Is On the TPII Team?
  • In The News
  • Contact Me
  • FAQs
    • Why Trust Me?

Community

  • #MeTooPhD
  • Peer Editing
  • PhD Debt Survey
  • Support Fund

Copyright © 2021 The Professor Is In·