• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

The Professor Is In

Guidance for all things PhD: Graduate School, Job Market and Careers

  • Home
  • Courses & Events
    • How To …
    • The Art of the Academic Cover Letter
    • The Art of the Article
    • Unstuck: The Art of Productivity
    • On Demand Courses
    • Upcoming Live Webinars
    • Free Productivity Webinars
    • Gift Certificates
  • Personalized Job Help
    • Document Editing
    • Quick Reviews
    • Specials
    • Interview Prep
    • Personal Negotiating Assistance
    • One on One Career Consults
    • Testimonials
    • Interview Testimonials
    • Graduate School Application Assistance
  • Productivity
  • Coaching
    • Productivity Coaching
    • Private Coaching
    • Leaving Academia Coaching Group
  • The Professor Is Out
    • It’s OK to Quit
    • Our Art of Leaving Program
    • Prof Is OUT Services
    • Our Prof Is OUT Team
    • Prof is OUT Client Testimonials
    • Ex-Academics: A TPIO Support Community
  • Workshops
  • Blog

World’s Finest Education? – Professor Is /Out/ Guest Post

By Guest Author | February 23, 2022

The author is an award winning science educator and his research has been featured online at Forbes and Discover Magazine. He is currently a laboratory director for one of the largest clinical laboratory companies in the United States.

 

“World’s Finest Education”: That’s an approximation of the slogan from my now former university. It’s also one of the main reasons  why I left my position there.

I’ve spent my career as a clinical scientist which means I’m board certified in a medical discipline and have  taught/ conduct research in addition to my clinical work. But the ratio of those academic pieces has always  been extremely skewed with 90% or more of my time devoted to clinical cases. That’s when I saw the posting for my most recent job.

The position at a medium sized, state university was advertised as seeking a clinical expert to teach  courses in a new, MS level graduate program. The experience sought was my exact area of clinical  expertise and included 20% consulting time. It seemed like a great way to readjust my career to be more  student focused without losing my clinical connection.

In retrospect, the warning flags are obvious even from the job ad. Candidates were asked to send the  usual cover letter, CV, transcripts, and teaching philosophy, but there was no mention of a research  statement. It was only after I applied and had conducted a phone interview that one was requested. Both  the document I sent and my interview presentation focused on my work on science education/ informal  communication for undergrad research projects. This seemed warmly received, with faculty after my talk proposing ideas like developing collaborations with local science museums.

The job began to come apart just weeks after I started. I was informed by our associate dean while  standing in a parking lot that I needed to start a molecular biology research program for undergrads. This  was with no personal lab space and no start-up research funds. I attempted to push-back, but it was clear  that I had experienced a “bait and switch”.

The cornerstone of my former department’s undergraduate curriculum was a two semester “Research  Initiative” beginning in the freshman spring semester. The initiative was billed as an opportunity for  undergraduates to engage in “authentic” scientific research with a mentor focusing on “real world  problems”. This initiative would allow them to experience the “thrill of discovery and problem solving”  outside the traditional classroom. Students could then opt to continue their research through  independent study into their junior and senior years.

This could have been a fantastic opportunity to engage students in their own learning through research,  but the reality of the initiative was very different.

As with formal courses, the university handled scheduling of Research Initiative sections. Unfortunately, they refused to take into account conflicting freshman/sophomore class requirements. During my last  semester, all of my Research Initiative students had conflicts with other courses during our scheduled  day/time. When I brought these conflicts to administrative attention, I was told that it was the instructor’s  responsibility to find alternatives.

Instructors were required to have a minimum of six students enrolled in their Research Initiative sections  or they were threatened with having them cancelled.

From experience, up to two thirds of students from a Research Initiative section would move forward into  independent research. The means that each year instructors were required to mentor more and more  undergraduate researchers. This constant influx of students forced instructors to in constantly be  developing more project ideas, writing more IRB protocols, and begging for more money (there was no time for grant writing). Looking ahead to my fourth year at the school, I could expect to be mentoring at  least six freshmen in my Research Initiative section and twelve undergrads at various levels through  independent research.

In reality I only lasted for two and a half years. When I left, I had ten Research Initiative undergrads, eight  independent research students, and nineteen Master’s level projects I had specifically been hired to  coordinate.

The research curriculum was unsustainable.

My fellow research mentors were overwhelmed and exhausted. Because of the registration requirements  and the ever-increasing number of independent students, project ideas were driven by the sheer number  of bodies we needed to accommodate, not faculty interest or scientific questions. Limited resources, lab  supplies, and equipment meant that many research sections were reduced to rudimentary group projects.  This wasnot authentic research.

When these issues were brought to administration, their sole solution was a promise to hire more adjunct  faculty. They explained that this would fix the problem and that current instructors “would be fine”.

During my time at the university, I watched as they developed the “World’s Finest Education” slogan as a  university brand. It was prominently displayed on the school’s webpage, printed onto promotional  handouts, and stamped onto frisbees, water bottles, and anything else they could press into the hands of  perspective students. During my last round of student recruitment, I started to regret my role in the  process.

I felt like an enabler and it made me feel guilty.

There was little reality in the pitch that I was hearing from the school, and my face and my  accomplishments despite overwhelming administrative neglect were being used to hide that reality.

Education was just bait. It wasn’t “World’s Finest” anything.

I literally never heard anyone address the quality of the education we were providing or ways we could  improve it. The faculty were too exhausted and administration didn’t care. Students told me stories of  pervasive cheating in science courses, of faculty not showing up for classes for over a month, of  homophobia and misogyny, and simply not being treated like human beings. As someone who had spent  a career developing my skills as an educator, it was demoralizing and depressing.

My exit from the university was completely unceremonious. I gave three months notice when I resigned  so that I could finish out the current semester for my students and to make sure replacement instructors  could be found for my next semester courses. During those three months, my resignation was never  acknowledged by the administration. No announcement in a faculty meeting. Not even a brief email.

I didn’t even have an exit interview.

World’s Finest Indeed.

Similar Posts:

  • How I Transitioned From the Ph.D. To Secondary Education – by Dr. Rebecca Simon
  • Starving the Beast
  • Toxic Hope
  • Introducing More #Post-Ac Experts: Tina Fanetti and Jason Tebbe
  • Call it Real-Ac

Filed Under: Goodbye Ivory Towers, Post-Ac Job Search, Quitting--An Excellent Option

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. CMO says

    March 1, 2022 at 3:31 pm

    Well expressed Rob. Sadly, these “unfunded mandates” universities are demanding of their faculty are a death knell to science and research. I wish you well my friend. 😉

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Buy My Book!

4.8 stars on Amazon!

The_Professor_Is_In.indd

Get Immediate Help

In addition to our blog and book, we have upcoming live webinars, pre-recorded webinars and other programs that you can get started on right away:

The Art of the Academic Cover Letter
The Art of the Article
Unstuck: The Art of Productivity
Quick Reviews
Free Productivity Webinars

Categories

  • #MeTooPhD
  • Academic Job Search
    • How To Choose and Manage Recommenders
    • How to Interview
    • How To Write Academic Job Cover Letters
    • How To Write CVs
    • Landing Your Tenure Track Job
    • Major Job Market Mistakes
    • Negotiating Offers
  • Adjunct Issues
  • Advising Advice
  • Alt-University Critique
  • Black Lives Matter
  • COVID19
  • Dispatches
  • Goodbye Ivory Towers
  • Graduate Student Concerns
    • Bad Advisors and Good Mentors
  • How To Do Conferences
  • How to Get Grants and Fellowships
  • International Perspectives
  • Intersectional Analyses
  • Makeup
  • Marginalized Voices
  • Mental Health and Academia
  • Ph.D. Poverty
  • Podcast
  • Post-Ac Free-Lancing and Small Business
  • Post-Ac Job Search
    • Careers Outside
  • Postdoc Issues
  • Productivity
    • Book Proposals and Contracts
    • Publishing Issues
    • Writing
  • Promote Yourself!
  • Quitting–An Excellent Option
  • Racism in the Academy
  • Rearview Mirror
  • Resumes & Postac Docs
  • Sexual Harassment in the Academy
  • Shame
  • Stop.Acting.Like.A.Grad.Student
  • Strategizing Your Success in Academia
  • Teaching and Research Statements
  • Teaching Demos
  • Teaching Portfolios
  • Tenure–How To Get It
    • How To Build Your Tenure File
    • Surviving Assistant Professorhood
  • The Campus Visit
  • Unstuck
  • Webinars
  • What Not To Wear
  • Women of Color in Academia
  • Work/Life Balance in Academia
  • Yes, You Can: Women in Academia
  • Your Second and Third Jobs

Footer

About Us

  • Who Is Dr. Karen?
  • Who Is On the TPII Team?
  • In The News
  • Contact Me
  • FAQs
    • Why Trust Me?
  • Testimonials

Community

  • #MeTooPhD
  • Peer Editing
  • PhD Debt Survey
  • Support Fund
  • I Help With Custody Cases for Academics

Copyright © 2023 The Professor Is In·

We Are Redefining Academic Community

That’s why we upgraded our private
Mighty Network.

We are committed to building a community with a focus on productivity support. Every day, in a dedicated space, we offer free coaching advice and encouragement. And the couple thousand people who have already joined are steadily building a supportive and interactive community devoted to that elusive idea of work-life balance.

Learn More

Get on Dr. Karen's Schedule

Get on my schedule to work on your tenure track job cover letter, CV, grant applications, book proposals, interview preparation, and more.  [si-contact-form form=’2′]